Kling v3 vs Veo 3.1 · AI video head-to-head
Kling 3.0 vs Veo 3.1: who wins?
10 blind duels · same prompt, names hiddenSame prompt, side by side
Not enough votes on this prompt yet.
How these clips were made
The exact settings behind the clips at the top. Open models run on our own GPU in ComfyUI: download the workflow and render the same clip yourself.
- Endpoint
kling3.0_pro- ratio
- 1920:1080
- duration
- 5
- audio
- false
Closed model: the prompt is sent as written, everything else is the provider's default.
- Endpoint
veo3.1- ratio
- 1280:720
- duration
- 6
- audio
- false
Closed model: the prompt is sent as written, everything else is the provider's default.
| Spec | Kling v3 | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Kuaishou | Google DeepMind |
| Elo | 995 | 971 |
| Win rate (all duels) | 46% | 29% |
| Max length | 10s | 8s |
| Resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Native audio | No | Yes |
| Price | ≈ €1.00 per 8 s clip | ≈ €2.90 per 8 s clip |
| Where to try | Kling AI | Google DeepMind |
| Speed | ⚡⚡⚡ | ⚡⚡ |
Voters prefer Veo 3.1 in 59% of 10 blind duels, so it's close.
Pick Kling v3 if you need motion, speed, price. Pick Veo 3.1 if photorealism, camera moves, lip-synced audio matter more (≈ €2.90 per 8 s clip on Google DeepMind vs ≈ €1.00 per 8 s clip for Kling v3).
Watch out: Kling v3 is most often flagged for no native audio; Veo 3.1 for slow on long prompts.
Judge more duels between these twoRankings come from votes only. Some links are ads — how we make money.