PixVerse V5 vs Veo 3.1 · AI video head-to-head
PixVerse V5 vs Veo 3.1: who wins?
5 blind duels · same prompt, names hiddenSame prompt, side by side
Not enough votes on this prompt yet.
How these clips were made
The exact settings behind the clips at the top. Open models run on our own GPU in ComfyUI: download the workflow and render the same clip yourself.
- Endpoint
fal-ai/pixverse/v5/text-to-video- aspect_ratio
- 16:9
- duration
- 5
- resolution
- 1080p
Closed model: the prompt is sent as written, everything else is the provider's default.
- Endpoint
veo3.1- ratio
- 1280:720
- duration
- 6
- audio
- false
Closed model: the prompt is sent as written, everything else is the provider's default.
| Spec | PixVerse V5 | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | PixVerse | Google DeepMind |
| Elo | 1017 | 971 |
| Win rate (all duels) | 68% | 29% |
| Max length | 8s | 8s |
| Resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Native audio | Yes | Yes |
| Price | from ≈ €10 / month | ≈ €2.90 per 8 s clip |
| Where to try | PixVerse | Google DeepMind |
| Speed | ⚡⚡⚡ | ⚡⚡ |
Voters prefer PixVerse V5 in 86% of 5 blind duels.
Pick PixVerse V5 if you need style, camera moves, speed. Pick Veo 3.1 if photorealism, camera moves, lip-synced audio matter more (≈ €2.90 per 8 s clip on Google DeepMind vs from ≈ €10 / month for PixVerse V5).
Watch out: Veo 3.1 is most often flagged for slow on long prompts; PixVerse V5 for faces in wide shots.
Judge more duels between these twoRankings come from votes only. Some links are ads — how we make money.