Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1 · AI video head-to-head
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1: who wins?
No head-to-head votes yetNot enough votes yet. We call a winner once these two have met in at least 5 blind duels. Judge duels to settle it.
Same prompt, side by side
Not enough votes on this prompt yet.
How these clips were made
The exact settings behind the clips at the top. Open models run on our own GPU in ComfyUI: download the workflow and render the same clip yourself.
- Endpoint
seedance2- ratio
- 1920:1080
- duration
- 5
- audio
- false
Closed model: the prompt is sent as written, everything else is the provider's default.
- Endpoint
veo3.1- ratio
- 1280:720
- duration
- 6
- audio
- false
Closed model: the prompt is sent as written, everything else is the provider's default.
| Spec | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Google DeepMind |
| Elo | 982 | 971 |
| Win rate (all duels) | 0% | 29% |
| Max length | 10s | 8s |
| Resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Native audio | No | Yes |
| Price | ≈ €0.60 per 5 s clip | ≈ €2.90 per 8 s clip |
| Where to try | Dreamina | Google DeepMind |
| Speed | ⚡⚡⚡ | ⚡⚡ |
Not enough votes yet to call a winner between Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1.
Pick Seedance 2.0 if you need multi-shot, speed. Pick Veo 3.1 if photorealism, camera moves, lip-synced audio matter more (≈ €2.90 per 8 s clip on Google DeepMind vs ≈ €0.60 per 5 s clip for Seedance 2.0).
Watch out: Veo 3.1 is most often flagged for slow on long prompts; Seedance 2.0 for faces at distance.
Judge more duels between these twoRankings come from votes only. Some links are ads — how we make money.